The team pushed for more AI in US Defense — and Promoting Big Tech

After Schmidt and Jassy, ​​members included Andrew Moore, Google’s head of cloud AI; Safra Catz, Co-CEO of Oracle; Eric Horvitz, MicrosoftResearch Director; Robert Work, a former security secretary who helped launch the Pentagon recently go to AI, and former Democratic FCC boss Mignon Clyburn.

The team started operations in 2019 and provided a number of interim and feedback reports before issuing a final 756 photos in March. It came with pre-arranged rules for lawmakers to copy and paste the group’s ideas into laws and draft White House rules.

Commissioners also appeared at Congress meetings, including one dedicated to public opinion. At a February meeting of the House Armed Services committee, Schmidt warned that “the threat of Chinese leadership in the major technical sectors is a global problem and must be addressed directly.”

Ylli Bajrremba, the former NSCAI director general, said Congress’s response to the council’s decision showed that the party had done its job. “I think Congress leaders understand that we need the necessary expertise that will govern our lives,” he said. “We enjoyed the support of both teams.”

Asked if the group was highly professional, Bajrereva said most of the 15 commissions were not from professional companies and were nominated by lawmakers and government agencies. The group consulted with “hundreds of companies and academics, as well as international partners” before offering comments, he said.

When WIRED asked professional companies if their involvement in the organization was causing controversy, their answers were ignored. Oracle did not respond to a request for comment.

Moore, chief executive of Google Cloud AI, said he was honored to do the job and hoped that other projects would “strengthen American AI leadership and develop stronger AI staff.” Amazon explained WIRED in Jassy’s comments at the March public meeting, in which he spoke about the importance of being “urgent” in what he described. Microsoft’s Horvitz said it led the committee’s work on “reliable and trustworthy AI” and that it “found all commissions, regardless of nationality, to be more committed to the task: national security and international development. United States.” Schmidt’s spokesman said he was appointed to the board because of his professionalism and wrote the necessary documents, which were reviewed by Pentagon lawyers.

The committee’s final report states that the integration of AI systems with “American values” is part of a global competition for expertise. “The more our commissions considered this, the more it became clear that one of the things that set us apart from China was the way we applied this technology,” Bajrereva said.

Some of the ideas are being considered by Congress to be included in the next security budget. One would require national security agencies and military agencies to have a senior leadership member who regularly works on “reliable AI.” Another may want to take a closer look at the dangers of privacy and the human rights of any type of AI affecting the US people.

Ben Winters, a lawyer who works for AI at the Electronic Privacy Information Center, supports some of these ideas, but says all of the agency’s ideas are based more on deploying, rather than coercing, AI.

The results are similar to the type of AI concept from professional companies, that is, those who do not have enough bite to meet the challenges posed by technology. “The idea behind the idea is ‘We must continue to adopt AI so that we don’t lose it in China,'” Winters says. “They have failed to enforce privacy laws or any rights of individuals affected by malicious AI.” EPIC he won a lawsuit against the commission that forced the release of a number of documents, including the commissioner’s ethics forms, but the details of the disclosure were changed.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *