Only safe predicting what makes Facebook a Senate hearing today and that, for a long time, will be different. Over the past three and a half years the company has sent all management executives, including CEO Mark Zuckerberg, to Washington to talk about Facebook and its affiliates, Instagram and WhatsApp. This has been read as a recurring demonstration of how an adult takes and abuses violence while mentioning the best ways in which Facebook connects the world. Modern evidence from Frances Haugen, a former employee who published thousands of pages of internal research The program of WStreet Street, Congress, and the Securities and Exchange Commission, would not be the case.
Haugen, who revealed who he was in 60 minutes section On Sunday, he was a former member of a cultural group: one whose job it was to tell the company how to make his platform better for humanity, even if he suffered from dedication and growth. For almost two years working there, however, Haugen realized that it was an impossible task. When disputes arose between business and security and the lives of users, “Facebook solved the problem in favor of its benefits,” as stated in its preliminary prepared statement. So he left the company – and they took most of their records. The documents, he says, confirm that Facebook is aware that “its business hurts children, divides divisions, reduces democracy, and much more” but chooses to address these issues.
So what do the documents show? Wall Street JournalHis reports, in the ongoing issue of “Facebook Files,” are the only window to this question. According to one story, Facebook’s transformation to make its ranks enjoy “good relationships” – a change that Zuckerberg openly described as “the right thing to do” – ultimately fostered false awareness, resentment, and other forms of misconduct. It did so excessively that European political parties told Facebook that they saw the need to take a dangerous position to just enter the public diet. After investigators brought their findings to Zuckerberg, the Notes he says, he refused to take action. Another article writes how Facebook app for “XCheck” implements laws limiting millions of VIP users around the world, some of whom take advantage of this freedom by posting violations of platform rules. Moreover, it is probably the most widely distributed to date, showing that Facebook’s financial security in many developing countries — where its platforms are primarily “internet” for millions of people — is either rarely or unavailable.
You can see the difficulties here both of Haugen and the filmmakers ask him questions: Such different revelations do not easily come together into one logical story. Perhaps for these reasons, the committee seems to be planning to focus on story whose title reads, “Facebook Knows Instagram Is Toxic for Teen Girls, Company Documents Show.” The committee has been hearing once on this topic, last week. As I wrote at the time, the documents in question, which Notes wrote in public, is more similar than the title. Based on common research, not the type of internal information that Facebook alone can access. In other words, they can be politically useful, but they don’t really help people understand how Facebook platforms work.
Some of the cache records, however, appear to be. Crucially, at least according to NotesAnnouncing, it shows the gaps between how Facebook executives describe what the company does in public and what happens on the platforms they own. In the same way Haugen’s experience as a loyal employee contradicts the demands of Facebook’s leadership. Demonstration can do more to advance a conversation than what you have found in the research.
Many Great Stories