What Social Media Should Learn From a Social Media

On October 10, 1999, The program of Los Angeles Times published a special Sunday magazine article dedicated to the inauguration of the Staples Center in downtown LA. It seems to be unfamiliar with Time The authors, including the authors and editors who put the magazine together, the paper partnered with Staples Center owners to share the profits on the commercials.

When the workers learned of the plan, they rebelled. More than 300 journalists and editors signed a statement authorizing the publisher to apologize. In 12 sections post mortem, columnist David Shaw, noted that “many Time the press room sees Staples’ story as the most obvious and ugly part on the most impressive price points. The treaty violated one of the most sacred elements in deep-seated journalism, sometimes called the “firewall” or the separation of church and state: the business department should not have control over elections.

Things have changed dramatically in the decades since the Staples Center event. Medical care has become a place for communication and media coverage. The leaders of the TV industry insist that they are not publishers but only electronic systems created by users. And yet at the same time proudly add an important role they play in modern communication and access to information. The ideas they form on the things they should see are the ones that most affect everything The program of Los Angeles Times could never dream about.

But the TV industry has never articulated the idea that the adherence to advertising should be fair as opposed to other theories. Facebook, in particular, does not seem to have anything to do with the separation of church and state. Search engine listing in The program of Wall Street Journal Last week provided new evidence of what happens if nothing prevents a business from defeating the people who are working to improve quality. One time, Notes reports, researchers within the company analyzed some of the changes in the News Feed concept designed to increase “positive relationships.” After the changes were introduced, CEO Mark Zuckerberg was publicly announced it was a “worthwhile thing” to do, even if it provided the time to use and the time to use the app. The researchers, however, found that factors that included the development of records that appeared to be more relevant to distribution were, inadvertently led to “a lot of false, deadly, and violent content.” According to the records of a Notes, while a senior official from Facebook’s department of technology wants the answer to the corporate business department – that is, in Zuckerberg – refused to comply. He did not want to give anyone a chance to use it.

In response to stories like this, Facebook indicates that it has increased money in safety and good care in recent years. This week the newspaper announced that it employs “40,000 security personnel, from 35,000 in 2019 and a fourfold increase from 10,000 in 2016.” (Then about one employee for 71,000 users, by the way.) But, like Notes and names reports have demonstrated over and over again, in critical times, the teams are selected for security decisions, content retention, and compliance are made by those leading the company’s growing and compelling operations. Facebook, in other words, needs its own kind of media coverage.

Instead, the lesson that TV companies will learn from traditional media is very common. The interesting thing is that the separation of the media from church to state is self-fulfilling. There is no national law that says a newspaper must stop its advertising activities from being delivered. It is a price that appeared in the 1920s, when American journalists volunteered to report impartial reports. As historian Michael Schudson explains in his book News Awareness: American Newspaper Culture History, this was a pivotal moment in journalism, as journalists and editors “embraced the meaning of the concept of independence without government or market.” Ideally, there is nothing to stop Jeff Bezos from disrupting the process The program of Washington Post, which he owns, affects Amazon, which he founded. By doing this, they could be at risk of retiring and significantly reducing the cost of Sendtype. No self-respecting journalist wants readers to think they are doing what they want to help. (According to all the news, Bezos has been well cared for since he bought the paper in 2013.)

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *