Brazil’s Supreme Court is examining a well-known rural rights case | Social Freedom Issues


The court’s defeat of the indigenous people could set an example for the restitution of human rights by President Bolsonaro.

The Supreme Court of Brazil has heard arguments against the last day of the trial, stating that local citizens are required to survive, while the government has enforced legal guarantees for farmers in the electric house.

The Supreme Court ruled on Wednesday whether the federal government responded to a lesser definition of indigenous peoples by simply recognizing indigenous territories at the time the Brazilian law was enacted in 1988.

The case is expected to drag on for several days and set a precedent that will affect hundreds of domestic cases.

The locals danced and sang outside the courtyard as they watched intently as the events unfolded at the outer window.

The lawyer for APIB’s largest family umbrella organization, Luiz Eloy Amado of Terena, said the law was not against the law because there was no time in the 1988 Constitution, which guarantees the right to ancestral lands.

“The question of land is important for Brazilian citizens,” Amado told the court.

He further added that another 800 appeals, a quarter of which will be finalized, will be dropped if the 1988 deadline is rejected by a court.

Protected areas provide protection for the Amazon rainforest. The court’s defeat of the indigenous people could be an example of restoring the freedom that President Jair Bolsonaro has demanded with the help of powerful agriculture.

The state’s attorney general, Bruno Bianco, said it had long provided security for farmers, many of whom had lived for decades on the land occupied by exiled citizens and the arrival of settlers in Europe.

Bianco said the matter was well resolved by Congress, when a law enacting the 1988 deadline as a law abolished the lower committee. He further added that the court should adjourn the decision until the law was passed.

The court adjourned until Thursday, when 18 spokespersons will appear before the judges to discuss the matter.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *