The House enacts a law establishing shares


WASHINGTON (AP) – Democrats have enacted a second law that would strengthen the voting law during the Supreme Court over the past 10 years.

The bill, which is part of a democratic effort to secure a general election, was passed in a vote of 219-212, without Republican support. The passage was commended by President Joe Biden, who said he was defending “sacred rights” and asked the Senate to “send this important bill to my desk.”

But the protests are unexpected in the chamber, where Democrats do not have enough votes to deal with dissidents from the Senate Republicans, who have rejected the law as “unnecessary” and “democratic” takeover.

The vote returns Democrats to the pre-election with little chance of making any voting rules before the 2022 mid-term elections, while some parties fear the new GOP rules, making it difficult for most Americans to vote.

But he has a goal to try.

Speaking from the House, President Nancy Pelosi said it was necessary for Congress to end the Republican efforts, which are known to be “dangerous” and “anti-democratic”.

“Democracy is under attack by the US-led blockade of Jim Crow,” Pelosi said.

The John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, cited as the death of a Georgia-based congressman who described his career, restored the voting protection that the Supreme Court had suspended. According to the petition, the Department of Justice is also making changes to new voting laws in countries that have disrupted numerous “violations”, forcing them to re-evaluate “foreknowledge.”

The practice was first introduced under the Voting Rights Act of 1965. However, it affected a number of unscrupulous individuals in the 2013 Supreme Court, who decided to notify countries that needed to have their laws reviewed outdated and unfair. The Court held, however, that Congress could devise a new approach, which is what the bill does.

The second ruling from the court in July made it difficult to challenge the court’s restrictions on some form of legislation.

Bill Assistant, a Rep. Terri Sewell, however, said that “old wars have started a new one,” as a result of a ruling by the Supreme Court.

“While literacy and voting taxes are non-existent, some states and territories have enacted laws that now prohibit voting,” said Sewell, a Democrat from Alabama.

In most cases, the new bill will not apply to laws enacted in the years since the court’s ruling in 2013. This includes the suspension of Republican-backed laws favored by Donald Trump’s false claims for the 2020 election.

But if it is signed into law in conjunction with another Democrats’ electoral bill, For the People Act, much of the legislation could be abolished – and it could also prevent it from being ratified. Both laws would have to face legal challenges.

In the short term, Tuesday’s vote is expected to appease Democratic activists who have been disappointed by the non-participation in the Senate.

NAACP president Derrick Johnson says he was “encouraged” by the passage of the bill. But he also risked a slight coverage, promising to take a closer look at how Parliament will deliver and “follow the full vote of yes and no”.

“Make no mistake, we will be there, by 2022, in every state that needs a new Senator,” he said in a statement.

Most of the 50-50 Democrats in the Senate mean they do not have the required 60 votes to end the filibuster. For months, activists have called for the abolition of the filibuster, but several hardworking Democrats oppose the idea, rejecting the necessary votes.

It is also unknown at this time what he will do after leaving the post.

One of the bills could block many types of voting laws, including those already in the register. This contradicts the notion from the West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, an independent Democrat in the chamber. He has been working for several weeks with the Senate leadership to formulate a smaller approach to access to The People Act, and he has called for a voting system that would allow people to use the same form and fines.

Republicans, meanwhile, have disrupted the process, knowing that Pelosi had called Democrats out of August to donate money, and to vote for what Democrats are using, as the US struggles to leave Afghanistan.

“If there was a temporary moment of decision-making aside, if there was a time to ignore politics I would think it would be today,” said House of Representatives Kevin McCarthy.

The Conservatives also criticized the bill as a departure from the 1965 voting law, which took into account the number of participants and the history of establishing voting rules for the selection of constituencies.

The new law, on the other hand, relies heavily on immutable standards, such as the application of a number of statutory laws that have been passed in voting cases, in order to pre-empt a constituency.

Republicans would say, they can play into the hands of Democrats, who have made legitimate and well-paid payments to oppose voting laws in unstable countries.

Rep. Michelle Fischbach, a Republican from Minnesota, predicted that this would be a good thing for democratically elected parties and lawyers, who “provide as much reason as possible to make cases.”

“It empowers the attorney general to harass their colleagues and ask permission from the government before changing their voting rules,” he said.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.