Hong Kong lawyers attacked by Chinese media have lost investigation | Political News

The well-known customary elections in the Law Society have come a long way this year amidst the challenges of international security legislation

Five activists who have claimed to be “experts” in political affairs voted in favor of Hong Kong’s Law Society council, undermining the hope of a firm that wants to take stronger action to protect the rule of law in the global economy.

Five out of 20 governing council seats were eligible.

The document earlier in Wednesday confirmed that the candidates have won all the seats.

Traditional elections have been dramatically disrupted this year amid the challenges of international security legislation.

Beijing officials and journalists have criticized some of them as politicians.

One of the so-called “generous” by Beijing journalists, Jonathan Ross, left this weekend, saying he wants to protect the safety of himself and his family.

The Society’s president Melissa Pang said the group would continue to defend the law against political interference.

“Skill is very important,” he said. When it comes to politics, we are politicians. “

The city’s legislative body has 12,000 members who are responsible for overseeing legislative reform, and it is said that in the process of appointing judges and lawyers who live in state legislatures.

In recent years, China’s autonomous city has undergone radical changes in a number of its laws, prompting pro-democracy activists and opposing politicians to warn of the abolition of freedom.

In a further development, the government has proposed a change in the City Censorship Ordinance that would allow the Secretary-General of Hong Kong to restore the identity of the media in favor of national security.

According to the theory, the maximum penalty for anyone who views a pornographic video could be imprisonment for up to three years and a fine of $ 1 million in Hong Kong ($ 128,000), according to a report in Hong Kong Free Press.

The bill will be tabled in Parliament for the first and second readings the following Wednesday.

The changes “will also make it clear that broadcasters should consider whether the video presentation would be in violation of national security”.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.